5 Reasons Why AI Won’t Replace Proofreaders and Editors

5 Reasons Why AI Won’t Replace Proofreaders and Editors

  • Published Jun 05, 2023
  • Last Updated Jul 22, 2025
  • 9 min read

If you’re considering a career as a freelance proofreader or editor, you may be wondering how the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) writing tools will impact your business. And while the landscape of this technology is always evolving, AI is not likely to replace proofreaders and editors anytime soon. In this blog post, we discuss:

  • What AI is
  • What advantages it offers for proofreading and editing
  • What limitations it has in proofreading and editing

Keep reading to learn why skilled editors and proofreaders are still in demand despite the surge in popularity of AI writing tools.

What Are AI Language Tools?

AI language tools – such as ChatGPT, Gemini, and Jasper – use natural language processing to generate well-structured, in-depth responses based on user prompts. Trained on vast amounts of written data, these tools can produce large volumes of text quickly, engage in back-and-forth “conversations,” and provide information on a wide range of topics.

Thanks to these capabilities, AI tools have become increasingly popular in writing and editing workflows. But while they can help with surface-level tasks – like catching typos or rephrasing sentences – they fall short when it comes to deeper editorial work. In particular, AI struggles with accuracy, tone, and adapting content for a specific audience. In the sections below, we’ll explore these limitations in more detail and explain why human proofreaders and editors remain essential.

Advantages of Using AI for Proofreading and Editing

When used alongside a real-life editor, AI can help streamline the proofreading and editing process. While it can’t replace human judgment, it can enhance efficiency and support early stages of editing.

Here are some of the ways AI tools can assist proofreaders and editors:

  • Error detection: AI can flag basic spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors quickly, helping reduce time spent on surface-level corrections.
  • Repetitiveness and redundancy: Some tools highlight repeated words or phrases, making it easier to tighten up prose.
  • Sentence restructuring: AI can suggest simpler or clearer versions of overly complex sentences, which is a useful starting point for improving readability.
  • Tone and formality adjustments: Many tools now offer tone analysis or suggestions to adjust the formality level, which editors can then fine-tune.
  • Faster turnaround: By handling early-stage corrections, AI allows editors to focus on deeper issues like narrative flow, structure, and voice, ultimately speeding up the review process.

Used thoughtfully, AI doesn’t replace the editor – it acts as a second set of eyes, helping identify patterns and freeing up mental space for more subjective errors and style issues.

Limitations of Using AI for Proofreading and Editing

While AI tools can be useful, they still fall short in areas that require interpretation, for instance, understanding context, preserving tone, and making judgment calls about what to change and what to leave alone.

Let’s look at some of these issues in more detail.

1. Factual Accuracy

One of the biggest risks of relying solely on AI is factual inaccuracy. AI models don’t verify information in real time; they generate text based on patterns in the data they were trained on. As a result, they can confidently present incorrect or misleading information as though it’s accurate.

Even well-regarded tools like ChatGPT have a known tendency to “hallucinate,” making up statistics, misquoting sources, or misunderstanding key concepts. A study by AIMultiple found that OpenAI GPT-4.5 had the lowest hallucination rate at 15%. However, there was a significant variance across models and tools – some had hallucination rates as high as 39%!

In a proofreading context, AI hallucinations can result in misused terminology, inaccurate claims, or invented citations that look authentic. That’s why it’s essential to have a human proofreader review AI-assisted content for accuracy. Whether it’s catching a misapplied technical term or flagging a fabricated source, human editors play a crucial role in maintaining trustworthiness.

Example: In a widely publicized 2023 case, two New York lawyers used ChatGPT to help draft a legal filing only to discover that the tool had confidently referenced nonexistent cases. The judge described the fabricated cases as having “bogus judicial decisions with bogus quotes and bogus internal citations.” Each lawyer was made to pay $5,000 in sanctions as a deterrent to other legal professionals considering doing the same. 

2. Contextual Understanding

AI algorithms may struggle to understand the context in which words or phrases are used. They can misinterpret meaning or apply corrections that technically follow grammar rules but distort the author’s intent.

For example, AI might confuse homophones like “complementary” and “complimentary” or suggest that “let’s table that idea” means to pursue it rather than postpone it, depending on whether it assumes American or British English. It may also rewrite a sentence to make it more “correct” grammatically but lose the author’s tone, emphasis, or rhetorical effect in the process.

These are subtle distinctions that a trained editor can catch and clarify. Human editors don’t just look at isolated words; they consider how each element of a sentence works in relation to the writer’s purpose, the broader paragraph, and the audience’s expectations.

This becomes even more important in creative or expressive writing where tone, voice, pacing, and implied meaning matter just as much as syntax. A good editor knows when to preserve an unconventional choice for effect and when to suggest a change – something AI simply can’t judge reliably.

3. Style Guide Limitations

Although AI tools can be prompted to follow certain formatting rules, they rarely apply complex style guides with total consistency. They aren’t familiar with a company’s brand voice, industry-specific terminology, or evolving editorial preferences unless explicitly trained on them. Even then, accuracy can be inconsistent.

For instance, AI might use inconsistent capitalization, apply an outdated grammar rule, or miss nuances in punctuation (such as US vs. UK English). Businesses and academic institutions rely on human editors to ensure content aligns with established tone, formatting conventions, and audience expectations. Whether enforcing in-house style or adapting voice for a specific client, this is where human oversight becomes indispensable.

4. Creativity and Editorial Expertise

AI tools aren’t designed to evaluate the strength of a character arc, suggest a more engaging scene transition, or flag emotionally insensitive wording. That’s where human creativity and editorial insight come in.

Editors often act as collaborators, offering structural suggestions, refining character development, and guiding narrative flow – all of which involve subjective interpretation and artistic judgment. But the value of human editors extends beyond creative insight. They also draw on emotional intelligence to deliver feedback constructively, adapting their tone and suggestions to suit the context and audience. Whether reviewing a personal memoir or a formal report, human editors bring empathy and professionalism that AI cannot replicate.

This blend of creativity and communication is especially important when editing sensitive content or working directly with clients. Editors don’t just correct; they connect, offering reassurance, encouragement, and constructive advice to help writers grow.

5. Nuanced Assessments and Ethical Oversight

While AI is trained to recognize certain patterns and errors, it often misjudges what to flag or fails to catch deeper inconsistencies altogether. It might overcorrect a sentence, introduce unnecessary changes, or miss a shift in tone that subtly undermines the message. A skilled proofreader, by contrast, understands how grammar, structure, and tone interact and knows when not to change something.

Editors are also responsible for the ethical integrity of the content they work on. They make informed decisions about subtle dialect differences, inclusivity, and biased language – areas that go beyond syntax. For example, they might identify gendered language in a job ad, flag harmful stereotypes in fiction, or ensure that medical or legal claims are supported by evidence.

AI, on the other hand, generates content without understanding its impact. It can’t evaluate appropriateness, cultural context, or ethical risk.

Example: A 2023 study found that AI-generated reference letters often displayed subtle gender bias. Letters for women were more likely to emphasize personality traits like being kind, communicating well, and having an “easygoing nature.” Letters for men, by contrast, focused on leadership, competence, and achievement. Example phrases included “natural talent,” “a standout in the industry,” and “a true original.” It’s clear that there is still some way to go in addressing gender stereotypes in AI-generated professional documents!

Will AI Replace Proofreaders and Editors?

While AI tools will continue to improve, they are unlikely to replace professional proofreaders and editors. Instead, AI is more likely to evolve into a supporting tool that works alongside editors, helping them work faster without compromising quality.

In fact, the growing use of AI may actually increase demand for skilled proofreaders and editors, particularly those who can review AI-generated content for:

  • Factual accuracy (verifying claims, sources, and data to catch hallucinations or misinformation)
  • Tone and clarity (ensuring the writing sounds natural, appropriate, and easy to understand)
  • Brand voice and audience fit (aligning language with the client’s brand and goals)
  • Bias and ethics (identifying problematic phrasing and ensuring inclusive, responsible language)

As more businesses experiment with AI-generated content, editors are being asked to polish, refine, and humanize that content. Specialist skills – such as developmental editing, copy editing, and sensitivity reading – are increasingly in demand.

With the right training, freelance editors can position themselves as indispensable collaborators in the content-creation process, offering nuance and attention to detail that no algorithm can match.

Futureproof Your Skills with Knowadays

Interested in pursuing a career as a freelance proofreader or editor, or in learning how to work effectively with AI? Our courses prepare you to offer high-quality services that go beyond what AI tools can deliver on their own.

Whether you’re just starting out or looking to futureproof your freelance skill set, Knowadays can help. Try some free lessons today!

Start your journey

Start your journey

Start your journey

Kick-start a flexible new career

Our Courses
Big arrow
Small arrow

Time for a change?

Sign up for a Knowadays free trial – it’s your first step towards a new career.


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.